[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUKmh0Gs8YH_iLbC@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:48:07 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lance.yang@...ux.dev, mhiramat@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sean@...e.io,
Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] hung_task: Enable runtime reset of
hung_task_detect_count
Adding Joel into Cc. He is improving the sysctl API...
On Mon 2025-12-15 22:00:36, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> Introduce support for writing to /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_detect_count.
>
> Writing any value to this file atomically resets the counter of detected
> hung tasks to zero. This grants system administrators the ability to clear
> the cumulative diagnostic history after resolving an incident, simplifying
> monitoring without requiring a system restart.
>
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ hung_task_detect_count
> ======================
>
> Indicates the total number of tasks that have been detected as hung since
> -the system boot.
> +the system boot. The counter can be reset to zero when written to.
>
> This file shows up if ``CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK`` is enabled.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
> index 5902573200c0..01ce46a107b0 100644
> --- a/kernel/hung_task.c
> +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,31 @@ static long hung_timeout_jiffies(unsigned long last_checked,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> +
> +/**
> + * proc_dohung_task_detect_count - proc handler for hung_task_detect_count
> + * @table: Pointer to the struct ctl_table definition for this proc entry
> + * @write: Flag indicating the operation
> + * @buffer: User space buffer for data transfer
> + * @lenp: Pointer to the length of the data being transferred
> + * @ppos: Pointer to the current file offset
> + *
> + * This handler is used for reading the current hung task detection count
> + * and for resetting it to zero when a write operation is performed.
> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +static int proc_dohung_task_detect_count(const struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> + void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + if (!write)
> + return proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
There have been some changes in the sysctl API recently, see
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251016-jag-sysctl_conv-v2-0-a2f16529acc4@kernel.org/
They are backward compatible, so the above code works. But it would be
nice to make it up-to-date, namely:
+ Replace "write" with "dir"
+ Use SYSCTL_USER_TO_KERN(dir) instead of (!write)
> + WRITE_ONCE(sysctl_hung_task_detect_count, 0);
I might be too conservative. But it looks weird to allow clearing the
value by any write. It would be better to return -EINVAL for non-zero
values. This would require using a copy of struct ctl_table and read
the value into a temporary variable.
> + *ppos += *lenp;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
I have played with the code. The diff on top of this patch would
look like:
diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
index 01ce46a107b0..ebb3dfd0b148 100644
--- a/kernel/hung_task.c
+++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static long hung_timeout_jiffies(unsigned long last_checked,
/**
* proc_dohung_task_detect_count - proc handler for hung_task_detect_count
* @table: Pointer to the struct ctl_table definition for this proc entry
- * @write: Flag indicating the operation
+ * @dir: Flag indicating the operation
* @buffer: User space buffer for data transfer
* @lenp: Pointer to the length of the data being transferred
* @ppos: Pointer to the current file offset
@@ -388,16 +388,29 @@ static long hung_timeout_jiffies(unsigned long last_checked,
* and for resetting it to zero when a write operation is performed.
* Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
*/
-static int proc_dohung_task_detect_count(const struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+static int proc_dohung_task_detect_count(const struct ctl_table *table, int dir,
void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
- if (!write)
- return proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ unsigned long detect_count = READ_ONCE(sysctl_hung_task_detect_count);
+ struct ctl_table t;
+ int err;
- WRITE_ONCE(sysctl_hung_task_detect_count, 0);
- *ppos += *lenp;
+ t = *table;
+ t.data = &detect_count;
- return 0;
+ err = proc_doulongvec_minmax(&t, dir, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ if (SYSCTL_USER_TO_KERN(dir)) {
+ /* The only valid value for clearing is zero. */
+ if (detect_count)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(sysctl_hung_task_detect_count, 0);
+ }
+
+ return err;
}
/*
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists