[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251217125747.GA689283-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 06:57:47 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: Anshul Dalal <anshuld@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] dt-bindings: arm: keystone: add boot_* mboxes to
ti,sci
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 07:57:08AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 11:38-20251215, Anshul Dalal wrote:
> > The bootloader on K3 devices makes use of mailboxes as per the ROM spec
> > which might be different than one's available to the kernel (firmware
> > spec).
> >
> > Therefore, this patch adds the missing mailbox entries to the DT binding
> > if the matching compatible is ti,am654-sci to represent the mailboxes
> > exposed by the hardware during boot for the purpose of loading the
> > firmware. The newly added mboxes are made optional by keeping minItems
> > as 2 to remain compliant with existing device-trees.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anshul Dalal <anshuld@...com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Added commit description for the optional mailboxes
> > - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251205-k3_syscon_add_boot_mailboxes-v4-1-8e216fb88941@ti.com
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Make new boot_* mboxes conditional on ti,am654-sci compatible
> > - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251112-k3_syscon_add_boot_mailboxes-v3-1-66155a4236dc@ti.com
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Drop [1/2] of the last patch series
> > - Update existing example with boot_* mailboxes instead of adding a new one
> > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251112-k3_syscon_add_boot_mailboxes-v2-0-aebc1e47b391@ti.com
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Remove maxItems entry
> > - Remove RFC tag from patch (added by mistake in v1)
> > - Document the new mailboxes in mboxes instead of mbox-names
> > - Provide example with all the mailboxes set
> > - Update commit title to have "ti,sci"
> > - Split into two patches
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251111-k3_syscon_add_boot_mailboxes-v1-1-529a27f21076@ti.com
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml | 50 +++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml
> > index 25a2b42105e5..d9eb2a81e539 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml
> > @@ -51,15 +51,15 @@ properties:
> > minItems: 1
> >
> > mbox-names:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + maxItems: 6
> > description: |
> > Specifies the mailboxes used to communicate with TI-SCI Controller
> > made available from TI-SCI controller.
> > - items:
> > - - const: rx
> > - - const: tx
> >
> > mboxes:
> > minItems: 2
> > + maxItems: 6
> >
> > ti,host-id:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > @@ -79,6 +79,42 @@ properties:
> > type: object
> > $ref: /schemas/reset/ti,sci-reset.yaml#
> >
> > +if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + const: ti,am654-sci
> > +then:
> > + properties:
> > + mbox-names:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + items:
> > + - const: rx
> > + - const: tx
> > + - const: notify
> > + - const: boot_rx
> > + - const: boot_tx
> > + - const: boot_notify
> > + mboxes:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + items:
> > + - description: RX thread
> > + - description: TX thread
> > + - description: Notify thread
> > + - description: boot stage RX thread
> > + - description: boot stage TX thread
> > + - description: boot stage Notify thread
> > +else:
> > + properties:
> > + mbox-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: rx
> > + - const: tx
> > + mboxes:
> > + items:
> > + - description: RX thread
> > + - description: TX thread
> > +
> > required:
> > - compatible
> > - mbox-names
> > @@ -99,11 +135,11 @@ examples:
> >
> > - |
> > dmsc: system-controller@...83000 {
> > - compatible = "ti,k2g-sci";
> > + compatible = "ti,am654-sci";
> > ti,host-id = <12>;
> > - mbox-names = "rx", "tx";
> > - mboxes = <&secure_proxy_main 11>,
> > - <&secure_proxy_main 13>;
> > + mbox-names = "rx", "tx", "notify", "boot_rx", "boot_tx";
> > + mboxes= <&secure_proxy_mcu 6>, <&secure_proxy_mcu 8>,
> > + <&secure_proxy_mcu 5>, <&secure_proxy_mcu 5>, <&secure_proxy_mcu 4>;
> > reg-names = "debug_messages";
> > reg = <0x44083000 0x1000>;
>
> Please add a different example for am654, i want to make sure k2g still
> continues to be checked.
>
> That said, AM62 series of devices do not use notification pipe for
> standard communication. So, the schema will break for those.
>
> in summary:
> k2g: rx, tx
> am654, j721e, j721s2, j7200, j784s4, .. : rx, tx, notify, boot_rx,
> boot_tx, boot_notify
> am625, am62p ..: rx, tx, boot_rx, boot_tx, boot_notify
>
> we will need three examples, and will need to add am62x series as one
> additional compatible.
Do we really? We have a whole tree of examples in .dts files.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists