[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e1d33ff-d902-4ae9-9162-e00d17a5e6d1@postmarketos.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 18:05:31 +0300
From: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>, Dmitry Baryshkov
<lumag@...nel.org>, Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Sajna <sajattack@...tmarketos.org>, barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/mdp5: drop support for MSM8998, SDM630 and SDM660
On 11.12.2025 04:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Currently MDP5 3.x (MSM8998, SDM630 and SDM660) platforms are support
> by both DPU and MDP5 drivers. Support for them in the DPU driver is
> mature enough, so it's no longer sensible to keep them enabled in the
> MDP5 driver. Not to mention that MSM8998 never used an MDP5 compatible
> string. Drop support for the MDP5 3.x genration inside the MDP5
> driver and migrate those to the DPU driver only.
>
> Note: this will break if one uses the DT generated before v6.3 as they
> had only the generic, "qcom,mdp5" compatible string for SDM630 and
> SDM660. However granted that we had two LTS releases inbetween I don't
> think it is an issue.
>
I've retested DPU driver on our downstream release based on 6.18 (by
using msm.prefer_mdp5=false kernel cmdline parameter) on all devices
at my disposal, and I can confirm DPU driver working fine an all SDM660,
SDM636 ones, but not on SDM630. Some logs from sdm630-sony-nile-pioneer
(Sony Xperia XA2):
[ 2.356546] msm_dpu c901000.display-controller: bound c994000.dsi
(ops dsi_ops [msm])
[ 2.357328] adreno 5000000.gpu: GPU speedbin fuse 146 (0x92), mapped
to opp-supp-hw 0x4
[ 2.364802] msm_dpu c901000.display-controller: bound 5000000.gpu
(ops a3xx_ops [msm])
[ 2.444649] [drm:dpu_kms_hw_init:1173] dpu hardware revision:0x30030000
[ 2.449793] [drm] Initialized msm 1.13.0 for
c901000.display-controller on minor 1
...
[ 2.911900] [drm:_dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_wait_for_ctl_start:654] [dpu
error]enc33 intf1 ctl start interrupt wait failed
[ 2.911916] [drm:dpu_kms_wait_for_commit_done:525] [dpu error]wait
for commit done returned -22
...
[ 3.176171] [drm:_dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_wait_for_ctl_start:654] [dpu
error]enc33 intf1 ctl start interrupt wait failed
[ 3.176367] [drm:dpu_kms_wait_for_commit_done:525] [dpu error]wait
for commit done returned -22
Which results in horrendous ~3-5 fps in shell.
The block "enc33 intf1 ctl start interrupt wait failed" + "wait for
commit done returned -22" is repeated few times per second whenever
the display is turned on, and stops when it's turned off.
Meanwhile it is working fine using MDP5 driver (msm.prefer_mdp5=true).
Well, as fine as possible considering [1], using several FD_MESA_DEBUG
tricks to work around GPU issues.
P.S. I have not yet tested MSM8998, but I can try if required
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/8442
--
Regards,
Alexey Minnekhanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists