linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-iocost: Correct comment ioc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aULg4f_nxLTbXvMh@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 06:57:05 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-iocost: Correct comment ioc_gq::level

On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 05:27:36PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
> This comment is simpler than reworking level users for possible
> ioc_gq::ancestors __counted_by annotation.

I don't understand the change here. Can you please elaborate a bit more?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun