[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <873458zzg9.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 11:21:42 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...nel.org>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Hugh Dickins
<hughd@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, "Matthew Wilcox
(Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Gavin Shan
<gshan@...hat.com>, Pankaj Raghav <kernel@...kajraghav.com>, Daniel
Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Control folio sizes used for page cache memory
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com> writes:
> Hi All,
>
> This series is an RFC that adds sysfs and kernel cmdline controls to configure
> the set of allowed large folio sizes that can be used when allocating
> file-memory for the page cache. As part of the control mechanism, it provides
> for a special-case "preferred folio size for executable mappings" marker.
>
> I'm trying to solve 2 separate problems with this series:
>
What happened to this patchkit? I was looking into how to efficiently
get larger pages for text transparently, and there doesn't seem
to be anything better than such a heuristic?
Thanks,
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists