lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gsntzf7g1zgp.fsf@coltonlewis-kvm.c.googlers.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 23:05:26 +0000
From: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@...nel.org>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net, 
	linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, 
	maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev, mizhang@...gle.com, 
	joey.gouly@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com, yuzenghui@...wei.com, 
	mark.rutland@....com, shuah@...nel.org, gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/24] KVM: arm64: Enforce PMU event filter at vcpu_load()

Oliver Upton <oupton@...nel.org> writes:

> Re-reading this patch...

> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 08:51:15PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
>> The KVM API for event filtering says that counters do not count when
>> blocked by the event filter. To enforce that, the event filter must be
>> rechecked on every load since it might have changed since the last
>> time the guest wrote a value.

> Just directly state that this is guarding against userspace programming
> an unsupported event ID.

Sure

>> +static void kvm_pmu_apply_event_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +	struct arm_pmu *pmu = vcpu->kvm->arch.arm_pmu;
>> +	u64 evtyper_set = ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL0 |
>> +		ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL1;
>> +	u64 evtyper_clr = ARMV8_PMU_INCLUDE_EL2;
>> +	u8 i;
>> +	u64 val;
>> +	u64 evsel;
>> +
>> +	if (!pmu)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < pmu->hpmn_max; i++) {

> Iterate the bitmask of counters and you'll handle the cycle counter 'for
> free'.

Will do.

> <snip>

>> +		val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + i);
>> +		evsel = val & kvm_pmu_event_mask(vcpu->kvm);
>> +
>> +		if (vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter &&
>> +		    !test_bit(evsel, vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter))
>> +			val |= evtyper_set;
>> +
>> +		val &= ~evtyper_clr;
>> +		write_pmevtypern(i, val);

> </snip>

> This all needs to be shared with writethrough_pmevtyper() instead of
> open-coding the same thing.

Will do.

> Thanks,
> Oliver

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ