[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVquNEoxRQkcBEH0nC+CDuib6o0H6m3CBk3ZN2267LpQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:28:27 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Thomas Fourier <fourier.thomas@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: 6214/2: fix release_mem_region() size
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your patch!
The patch prefix should be "auxdisplay: arm-charlcd:", not an rmk
patch tracker ID.
On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 18:49, Thomas Fourier <fourier.thomas@...il.com> wrote:
> It seems like, after the request_mem_region(), the corresponding
> release_mem_region() must take the same size. This was done
> in charlcd_remove() but not in the error path in charlcd_probe().
Unfortunately charlcd_remove() was removed in one of these silly
"make <foo> explicitly non-modular" patches...
> Fixes: ce8962455e90 ("ARM: 6214/2: driver for the character LCD found in ARM refdesigns")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Fourier <fourier.thomas@...il.com>
> --- a/drivers/auxdisplay/arm-charlcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/auxdisplay/arm-charlcd.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int __init charlcd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> out_no_irq:
> iounmap(lcd->virtbase);
> out_no_memregion:
Looks like the first "goto out_no_memregion" is incorrect, and should be
"goto out_no_resource".
> - release_mem_region(lcd->phybase, SZ_4K);
> + release_mem_region(lcd->phybase, lcd->physize);
> out_no_resource:
> kfree(lcd);
> return ret;
The actual change LGTM to me, so
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists