[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3de2b568-66f8-432f-a501-b19ca6c3a805@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:42:14 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Linu Cherian <Linu.Cherian@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/13] arm64: mm: Simplify
__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess()
On 16/12/25 8:15 pm, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>
> __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() is unnecessarily complicated:
>
> - It takes a 'start', 'end' and 'pages' argument, whereas it only
> needs 'pages' (which the caller has computed from the other two
> arguments!).
>
> - It erroneously compares 'pages' with MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES when
> the system doesn't support range-based invalidation but the range to
> be invalidated would result in fewer than MAX_DVM_OPS invalidations.
>
> Simplify the function so that it no longer takes the 'start' and 'end'
> arguments and only considers the MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES threshold on
> systems that implement range-based invalidation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 20 ++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 0e1902f66e01..3b72a71feac0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -527,21 +527,13 @@ static __always_inline void __flush_tlb_range_op(tlbi_op lop, tlbi_op rop,
> #define __flush_s2_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, tlb_level) \
> __flush_tlb_range_op(op, r##op, start, pages, stride, 0, tlb_level, kvm_lpa2_is_enabled())
>
> -static inline bool __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end, unsigned long pages, unsigned long stride)
> +static inline bool __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(unsigned long pages,
> + unsigned long stride)
> {
> - /*
> - * When the system does not support TLB range based flush
> - * operation, (MAX_DVM_OPS - 1) pages can be handled. But
> - * with TLB range based operation, MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES
> - * pages can be handled.
> - */
> - if ((!system_supports_tlb_range() &&
> - (end - start) >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride)) ||
> - pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES)
> + if (system_supports_tlb_range() && pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES)
> return true;
>
> - return false;
> + return pages >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
The function will return true if tlb range is supported, but
((MAX_DVM_OPS * stride) >> PAGE_SHIFT) < pages <= MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES.
So I think you need to do
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1b15b4f0-5490-4dac-8344-e716dd189751@arm.com/
> }
>
> static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct mm_struct *mm,
> @@ -555,7 +547,7 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct mm_struct *mm,
> end = round_up(end, stride);
> pages = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - if (__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(start, end, pages, stride)) {
> + if (__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(pages, stride)) {
> flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> return;
> }
> @@ -619,7 +611,7 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end
> end = round_up(end, stride);
> pages = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - if (__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(start, end, pages, stride)) {
> + if (__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(pages, stride)) {
> flush_tlb_all();
> return;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists