[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUJ3A7Ec7EVAI3FB@fedora>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 17:25:23 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: huang-jl <huang-jl@...pseek.com>
Cc: csander@...estorage.com, axboe@...nel.dk, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring: fix nr_segs calculation in io_import_kbuf
On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 02:26:32PM +0800, huang-jl wrote:
> io_import_kbuf() calculates nr_segs incorrectly when iov_offset is
> non-zero after iov_iter_advance(). It doesn't account for the partial
> consumption of the first bvec.
>
> The problem comes when meet the following conditions:
> 1. Use UBLK_F_AUTO_BUF_REG feature of ublk.
> 2. The kernel will help to register the buffer, into the io uring.
> 3. Later, the ublk server try to send IO request using the registered
> buffer in the io uring, to read/write to fuse-based filesystem, with
> O_DIRECT.
>
> From a userspace perspective, the ublk server thread is blocked in the
> kernel, and will see "soft lockup" in the kernel dmesg.
>
> When ublk registers a buffer with mixed-size bvecs like [4K]*6 + [12K]
> and a request partially consumes a bvec, the next request's nr_segs
> calculation uses bvec->bv_len instead of (bv_len - iov_offset).
>
> This causes fuse_get_user_pages() to loop forever because nr_segs
> indicates fewer pages than actually needed.
>
> Specifically, the infinite loop happens at:
> fuse_get_user_pages()
> -> iov_iter_extract_pages()
> -> iov_iter_extract_bvec_pages()
> Since the nr_segs is miscalculated, the iov_iter_extract_bvec_pages
> returns when finding that i->nr_segs is zero. Then
> iov_iter_extract_pages returns zero. However, fuse_get_user_pages does
> still not get enough data/pages, causing infinite loop.
>
> Example:
> - Bvecs: [4K, 4K, 4K, 4K, 4K, 4K, 12K, ...]
> - Request 1: 32K at offset 0, uses 6*4K + 8K of the 12K bvec
> - Request 2: 32K at offset 32K
> - iov_offset = 8K (8K already consumed from 12K bvec)
> - Bug: calculates using 12K, not (12K - 8K) = 4K
> - Result: nr_segs too small, infinite loop in fuse_get_user_pages.
>
> Fix by accounting for iov_offset when calculating the first segment's
> available length.
>
> Fixes: b419bed4f0a6 ("io_uring/rsrc: ensure segments counts are correct on kbuf buffers")
> Signed-off-by: huang-jl <huang-jl@...pseek.com>
> ---
> v2: Optimize the logic to handle the iov_offset and add Fixes tag.
>
> > Please add a Fixes tag
>
> Thanks for your notice, this is my first time to send patch to linux. I
> have add the Fixes tag, but not sure if I am doing it correctly.
>
> > Would a simpler fix be just to add a len += iter->iov_offset before the loop?
>
> Great suggestion! I have tried it, and also fix the bug correctly.
>
> io_uring/rsrc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> index a63474b331bf..41c89f5c616d 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
> +++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> @@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ static int io_import_kbuf(int ddir, struct iov_iter *iter,
> if (count < imu->len) {
> const struct bio_vec *bvec = iter->bvec;
>
> + len += iter->iov_offset;
> while (len > bvec->bv_len) {
> len -= bvec->bv_len;
> bvec++;
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists