[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251217095445.218428-4-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 17:54:39 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: ast@...nel.org,
andrii@...nel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/9] bpf: add the kfunc bpf_fsession_is_return
If TRACE_SESSION exists, we will use the bit (1 << BPF_TRAMP_M_IS_RETURN)
in ctx[-1] to store the "is_return" flag.
Introduce the kfunc bpf_fsession_is_return(), which is used to tell if it
is fexit currently. Meanwhile, inline it in the verifier.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>
Co-developed-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
---
v4:
- split out the bpf_fsession_cookie() to another patch
v3:
- merge the bpf_tracing_is_exit and bpf_fsession_cookie into a single
patch
v2:
- store the session flags after return value, instead of before nr_args
- inline the bpf_tracing_is_exit, as Jiri suggested
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 +++++++++-
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 3b2273b110b8..d165ace5cc9b 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1213,6 +1213,9 @@ enum {
#endif
};
+#define BPF_TRAMP_M_NR_ARGS 0
+#define BPF_TRAMP_M_IS_RETURN 8
+
struct bpf_tramp_links {
struct bpf_tramp_link *links[BPF_MAX_TRAMP_LINKS];
int nr_links;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 96753833c090..b0dcd715150f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12380,6 +12380,7 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
KF___bpf_trap,
KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_signal_impl,
KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_resume_impl,
+ KF_bpf_fsession_is_return,
};
BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
@@ -12454,6 +12455,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_dynptr_file_discard)
BTF_ID(func, __bpf_trap)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_signal_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_resume_impl)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_fsession_is_return)
static bool is_task_work_add_kfunc(u32 func_id)
{
@@ -12508,7 +12510,8 @@ get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno];
bool arg_mem_size = false;
- if (meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx])
+ if (meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx] ||
+ meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_fsession_is_return])
return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CTX;
/* In this function, we verify the kfunc's BTF as per the argument type,
@@ -22556,6 +22559,12 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rdonly_cast]) {
insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
*cnt = 1;
+ } else if (desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_fsession_is_return]) {
+ /* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */
+ insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
+ insn_buf[1] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_TRAMP_M_IS_RETURN);
+ insn_buf[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1);
+ *cnt = 3;
}
if (env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].arg_prog) {
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 10c9992d2745..0857d77eb34c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3356,12 +3356,49 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kprobe_multi_kfunc_set = {
.filter = bpf_kprobe_multi_filter,
};
-static int __init bpf_kprobe_multi_kfuncs_init(void)
+__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
+
+__bpf_kfunc bool bpf_fsession_is_return(void *ctx)
+{
+ /* This helper call is inlined by verifier. */
+ return !!(((u64 *)ctx)[-1] & (1 << BPF_TRAMP_M_IS_RETURN));
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
+
+BTF_KFUNCS_START(tracing_kfunc_set_ids)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_fsession_is_return, KF_FASTCALL)
+BTF_KFUNCS_END(tracing_kfunc_set_ids)
+
+static int bpf_tracing_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
{
- return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, &bpf_kprobe_multi_kfunc_set);
+ if (!btf_id_set8_contains(&tracing_kfunc_set_ids, kfunc_id))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING ||
+ prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_SESSION)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_tracing_kfunc_set = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .set = &tracing_kfunc_set_ids,
+ .filter = bpf_tracing_filter,
+};
+
+static int __init bpf_trace_kfuncs_init(void)
+{
+ int err = 0;
+
+ err = err ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, &bpf_kprobe_multi_kfunc_set);
+ err = err ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_tracing_kfunc_set);
+
+ return err;
}
-late_initcall(bpf_kprobe_multi_kfuncs_init);
+late_initcall(bpf_trace_kfuncs_init);
typedef int (*copy_fn_t)(void *dst, const void *src, u32 size, struct task_struct *tsk);
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists