[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUQbpVyfEF0yrWSX@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:20:05 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@...esys.com>,
Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] usb: ohci-nxp: clean up probe error labels
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:09:52AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 03:19:45PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Error labels should be named after what they do rather than after from
> > where they are jumped to.
> >
> > Rename the probe error labels for consistency and to improve
> > readability.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> > ---
>
> Johan, in the 3/5 patch you also changed a statement label, which was
> not directly related to that patch's actual purpose, but it is directly
> related to this one's. Can you move that rename from that patch to this
> one?
Sure. The label "fail_disable" didn't make any sense to me but looking
at the driver again now I see that it's named after the usb_disabled()
check and the rename could indeed be done as part of this patch.
I'll address this in a v2.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists