[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251218032327.199721-1-wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:23:23 +0800
From: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+9ca2c6e6b098bf5ae60a@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] exec: do not call sched_mm_cid_after_execve() on exec fail
sched_mm_cid_after_execve() is called from the failure path
of bprm_execve(). At that point exec has not completed successfully,
so updating the mm CID state is incorrect and can trigger a panic,
as reported by syzbot.
Remove the call from the exec failure path.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+9ca2c6e6b098bf5ae60a@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 9d5ebc9d15b0..9044a75d26ab 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1773,7 +1773,6 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
if (bprm->point_of_no_return && !fatal_signal_pending(current))
force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV);
- sched_mm_cid_after_execve(current);
rseq_force_update();
current->in_execve = 0;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists