lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251218032327.199721-1-wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:23:23 +0800
From: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	syzbot+9ca2c6e6b098bf5ae60a@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] exec: do not call sched_mm_cid_after_execve() on exec fail

sched_mm_cid_after_execve() is called from the failure path
of bprm_execve(). At that point exec has not completed successfully,
so updating the mm CID state is incorrect and can trigger a panic,
as reported by syzbot.

Remove the call from the exec failure path.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+9ca2c6e6b098bf5ae60a@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
---
 fs/exec.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 9d5ebc9d15b0..9044a75d26ab 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1773,7 +1773,6 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	if (bprm->point_of_no_return && !fatal_signal_pending(current))
 		force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV);
 
-	sched_mm_cid_after_execve(current);
 	rseq_force_update();
 	current->in_execve = 0;
 
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ