[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUSQLB1fmYgQe_Fg@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 18:37:16 -0500
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To: Junhui Liu <junhui.liu@...moral.tech>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] clk: anlogic: add cru support for Anlogic DR1V90
SoC
Hi Junhui,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 11:39:43AM +0800, Junhui Liu wrote:
> +static long cru_div_gate_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw);
> +
> + return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, prate, divider->table,
> + divider->width, divider->flags);
> +}
The round_rate clk op is deprecated and I'm really close to being able
to remove this from the clk core. Please only use determine_rate()
below.
> +static int cru_div_gate_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + struct cru_div_gate *div_gate = hw_to_cru_div_gate(hw);
> + struct clk_divider *divider = &div_gate->divider;
> + unsigned long maxdiv, mindiv;
> + int div = 0;
> +
> + maxdiv = clk_div_mask(divider->width) + 1;
> + mindiv = div_gate->min + 1;
> +
> + div = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(req->best_parent_rate, req->rate);
> + div = div > maxdiv ? maxdiv : div;
> + div = div < mindiv ? mindiv : div;
> +
> + req->rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(req->best_parent_rate, div);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
[snip]
> +const struct clk_ops dr1_cru_div_gate_ops = {
> + .enable = cru_div_gate_enable,
> + .disable = cru_div_gate_disable,
> + .is_enabled = cru_div_gate_is_enabled,
> + .recalc_rate = cru_div_gate_recalc_rate,
> + .round_rate = cru_div_gate_round_rate,
> + .determine_rate = cru_div_gate_determine_rate,
When round_rate() and determine_rate() are both defined in the provider,
only the determine_rate() will be used. Just drop your round_rate()
implementation.
I didn't look into anything else on this patch. This showed up on my
search for new implementations.
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists