lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0n0ib6k.fsf@yellow.woof>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:57:55 +0700
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Gabriele Monaco
 <gmonaco@...hat.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
 linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>, Clark
 Williams <williams@...hat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] rv: Add Hybrid Automata monitor type

Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com> writes:
> +static inline void ha_start_timer_ns(struct ha_monitor *ha_mon, enum envs env,
> +				     u64 expire, u64 time_ns)
> +{
> +	u64 passed = ha_invariant_passed_ns(ha_mon, env, expire, time_ns);
> +
> +	ha_start_timer_jiffy(ha_mon, ENV_MAX_STORED,
> +			     nsecs_to_jiffies(expire - passed) + 1, time_ns);

What is the +1 for? I guess to prevent it being rounded down to zero? If
so, maybe we should do

     nsecs_to_jiffies(expire - passed + TICK_NSEC - 1)

instead.

Anyway, no big deal:
Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ