[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0n0ib6k.fsf@yellow.woof>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:57:55 +0700
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Gabriele Monaco
<gmonaco@...hat.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>, Clark
Williams <williams@...hat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] rv: Add Hybrid Automata monitor type
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com> writes:
> +static inline void ha_start_timer_ns(struct ha_monitor *ha_mon, enum envs env,
> + u64 expire, u64 time_ns)
> +{
> + u64 passed = ha_invariant_passed_ns(ha_mon, env, expire, time_ns);
> +
> + ha_start_timer_jiffy(ha_mon, ENV_MAX_STORED,
> + nsecs_to_jiffies(expire - passed) + 1, time_ns);
What is the +1 for? I guess to prevent it being rounded down to zero? If
so, maybe we should do
nsecs_to_jiffies(expire - passed + TICK_NSEC - 1)
instead.
Anyway, no big deal:
Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists