[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <176604166015.697128.10969426809262148398.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:37:40 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
ntb@...ts.linux.dev, Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczynski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
On Fri, 07 Nov 2025 15:25:26 +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
> used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
> schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
> again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
> This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] PCI: endpoint: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
commit: 8b2ff37c6b50cbe722ebd780aac40f92c4f8efd3
Best regards,
--
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists