[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251218083747.GI3707891@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:37:47 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com, yu.c.chen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] [sched/fair] 089d84203a:
pts.schbench.32.usec,_99.9th_latency_percentile 52.4% regression
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 12:59:53PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> kernel test robot noticed a 52.4% regression of pts.schbench.32.usec,_99.9th_latency_percentile on:
>
>
> commit: 089d84203ad42bc8fd6dbf41683e162ac6e848cd ("sched/fair: Fold the sched_avg update")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
Well, that obviously wasn't the intention. Let me pull that patch :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists