[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d373f7b0-f822-4c31-990c-41a6cdc76db3@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:44:11 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
To: chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
andreas@...sler.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com
Cc: kevin.brodsky@....com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, ziy@...dia.com,
chengkaitao@...inos.cn, willy@...radead.org, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: Use vmemmap_populate_hugepages for
vmemmap_populate
On 12/17/25 13:08, chengkaitao wrote:
> From: Chengkaitao <chengkaitao@...inos.cn>
>
> 1. Added the vmemmap_false_pmd function to accommodate architectures
> that do not support basepages.
> 2. In the SPARC architecture, reimplemented vmemmap_populate using
> vmemmap_populate_hugepages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengkaitao <chengkaitao@...inos.cn>
> ---
> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 7 +++++-
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
> index df9f7c444c39..a80cdfa6ba98 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> * Copyright (C) 1996-1999 David S. Miller (davem@...p.rutgers.edu)
> * Copyright (C) 1997-1999 Jakub Jelinek (jj@...site.mff.cuni.cz)
> */
> -
> +
> #include <linux/extable.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> @@ -2397,11 +2397,11 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
> * work.
> */
> init_mm.pgd += ((shift) / (sizeof(pgd_t)));
> -
> +
> memset(swapper_pg_dir, 0, sizeof(swapper_pg_dir));
>
> inherit_prom_mappings();
> -
> +
> /* Ok, we can use our TLB miss and window trap handlers safely. */
> setup_tba();
>
Bunch of unrelated changes that should not go in here.
> @@ -2581,8 +2581,8 @@ unsigned long _PAGE_CACHE __read_mostly;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(_PAGE_CACHE);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> -int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long vstart, unsigned long vend,
> - int node, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> +void __meminit vmemmap_set_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, void *p, int node,
> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long next)
> {
> unsigned long pte_base;
>
> @@ -2595,39 +2595,25 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long vstart, unsigned long vend,
>
> pte_base |= _PAGE_PMD_HUGE;
>
> - vstart = vstart & PMD_MASK;
> - vend = ALIGN(vend, PMD_SIZE);
> - for (; vstart < vend; vstart += PMD_SIZE) {
> - pgd_t *pgd = vmemmap_pgd_populate(vstart, node);
> - unsigned long pte;
> - p4d_t *p4d;
> - pud_t *pud;
> - pmd_t *pmd;
> -
> - if (!pgd)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - p4d = vmemmap_p4d_populate(pgd, vstart, node);
> - if (!p4d)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - pud = vmemmap_pud_populate(p4d, vstart, node);
> - if (!pud)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - pmd = pmd_offset(pud, vstart);
> - pte = pmd_val(*pmd);
> - if (!(pte & _PAGE_VALID)) {
> - void *block = vmemmap_alloc_block(PMD_SIZE, node);
> + pmd_val(*pmd) = pte_base | __pa(p);
> +}
>
> - if (!block)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> +bool __meminit vmemmap_false_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, int node)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
>
> - pmd_val(*pmd) = pte_base | __pa(block);
> - }
> - }
> +int __meminit vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, int node,
> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long next)
> +{
> + vmemmap_verify((pte_t *)pmdp, node, addr, next);
> + return 1;
> +}
>
> - return 0;
> +int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long vstart, unsigned long vend,
> + int node, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> +{
> + return vmemmap_populate_hugepages(vstart, vend, node, altmap);
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP */
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 15076261d0c2..5e005b0f947d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -4248,6 +4248,7 @@ void *vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(unsigned long size, int node,
> void vmemmap_verify(pte_t *, int, unsigned long, unsigned long);
> void vmemmap_set_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, void *p, int node,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long next);
> +bool vmemmap_false_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, int node);
> int vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, int node,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long next);
> int vmemmap_populate_basepages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 37522d6cb398..bd54b8c6f56e 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -407,6 +407,11 @@ void __weak __meminit vmemmap_set_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, void *p, int node,
> {
> }
>
> +bool __weak __meminit vmemmap_false_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, int node)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Reading that function I have absolutely no clue what this is supposed to
do. :)
Also, why are you passing pmd+node when sparc ignores them completely
and statically returns "true" ?
If you can tell me what the semantics of that function should be, maybe
we can come up with a more descriptive name.
--
Cheers
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists