[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dt6tg3ehtz55kej2d27youm2naqjnaieczop7pzodry4lp75yi@nv5ujnxxj5oj>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:14:20 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Melbin K Mathew <mlbnkm1@...il.com>
Cc: stefanha@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 3/4] vsock/test: fix seqpacket message bounds test
On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 07:12:05PM +0100, Melbin K Mathew wrote:
I honestly don't understand why you changed the author of this patch.
Why not just including the one I sent to you here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAGxU2F6TMP7tOo=DONL9CJUW921NXyx9T65y_Ai5pbzh1LAQaA@mail.gmail.com/
If there is any issue, I can send it separately.
Stefano
>The test requires the sender (client) to send all messages before waking
>up the receiver (server).
>
>Since virtio-vsock had a bug and did not respect the size of the TX
>buffer, this test worked, but now that we have fixed the bug, it hangs
>because the sender fills the TX buffer before waking up the receiver.
>
>Set the buffer size in the sender (client) as well, as we already do for
>the receiver (server).
>
>Fixes: 5c338112e48a ("test/vsock: rework message bounds test")
>Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>Signed-off-by: Melbin K Mathew <mlbnkm1@...il.com>
>---
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>index 9e1250790f33..0e8e173dfbdc 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>
> static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
> {
>+ unsigned long long sock_buf_size;
> unsigned long curr_hash;
> size_t max_msg_size;
> int page_size;
>@@ -363,6 +364,16 @@ static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
>
>+ sock_buf_size = SOCK_BUF_SIZE;
>+
>+ setsockopt_ull_check(fd, AF_VSOCK, SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE,
>+ sock_buf_size,
>+ "setsockopt(SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE)");
>+
>+ setsockopt_ull_check(fd, AF_VSOCK, SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE,
>+ sock_buf_size,
>+ "setsockopt(SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE)");
>+
> /* Wait, until receiver sets buffer size. */
> control_expectln("SRVREADY");
>
>--
>2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists