linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 6/6] net: phy: motorcomm: fix duplex setting error for phy leds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c3f80434-ff57-4324-b0f4-3b8b5e03911b@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:39:22 +0800
From: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <shaojijie@...wei.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	<horms@...nel.org>, <Frank.Sae@...or-comm.com>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <shenjian15@...wei.com>, <liuyonglong@...wei.com>,
	<chenhao418@...wei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
	<salil.mehta@...wei.com>, <shiyongbang@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 6/6] net: phy: motorcomm: fix duplex setting
 error for phy leds


on 2025/12/17 21:49, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 09:05:20PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:
>> on 2025/12/16 15:21, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 08:57:05PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:
>>>> fix duplex setting error for phy leds
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 355b82c54c12 ("net: phy: motorcomm: Add support for PHY LEDs on YT8521")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
>>> Please don't mix new development and fixes in one patchset. Please
>>> base this patch on net, and send it on its own.
>>>
>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>>>
>>> Fixes are accepted any time, it does not matter about the merge
>>> window.
>>>
>>> 	Andrew
>> Yes, this is RFC, just for code review.
>> I sent it to net when requesting a merge.
> This is however a real fix. The motorcomm driver is broken. Why wait
> to fix it?
>
> 	Andrew


Alright, this patch shouldn't require an RFC
and has no direct relation to this patch set.

I'll send it directly to net.

Thanks!
Shao Jijie