[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025121835-flattop-july-3c62@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:23:55 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Haoxiang Li <lihaoxiang@...c.iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: perex@...ex.cz, rafael@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PNP: add a put_device() in isapnp_init()
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 04:36:46PM +0800, Haoxiang Li wrote:
> if pnp_register_protocol() fails, call put_device()
> to drop the device reference.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Haoxiang Li <lihaoxiang@...c.iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c b/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c
> index 219f96f2aaaf..d6daab7ed59e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c
> @@ -983,8 +983,10 @@ static int __init isapnp_init(void)
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> - if (pnp_register_protocol(&isapnp_protocol) < 0)
> + if (pnp_register_protocol(&isapnp_protocol) < 0) {
> + put_device(&isapnp_protocol.dev);
Same here, this feels very wrong.
How was this tested?
How was this found?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists