[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9e3cd01-0c88-adc2-fdd1-ed85414c7550@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 20:10:07 +0800
From: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>,
Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] LoongArch: Add paravirt support with
vcpu_is_preempted() in guest side
On 2025/12/6 下午9:04, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Bibo,
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 10:48 AM Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> Function vcpu_is_preempted() is used to check whether vCPU is preempted
>> or not. Here add implementation with vcpu_is_preempted() when option
>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT is enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 3 +++
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>> index e76d3aa1e1eb..fa3eaf7e48f2 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>> @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
>> +bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu);
>> +
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
>>
>> #include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>> index b1b51f920b23..b61a93c6aec8 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static void pv_disable_steal_time(void)
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_preempt_key);
>> static int pv_time_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> @@ -267,6 +268,18 @@ static int pv_time_cpu_down_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +bool notrace vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_steal_time *src;
>> +
>> + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&virt_preempt_key))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);
>> + return !!(src->preempted & KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vcpu_is_preempted);
>> #endif
>>
>> static void pv_cpu_reboot(void *unused)
>> @@ -308,6 +321,9 @@ int __init pv_time_init(void)
>> pr_err("Failed to install cpu hotplug callbacks\n");
>> return r;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PREEMPT))
>> + static_branch_enable(&virt_preempt_key);
>> #endif
>>
>> static_call_update(pv_steal_clock, paravt_steal_clock);
>> @@ -318,7 +334,12 @@ int __init pv_time_init(void)
>> static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_steal_rq_enabled);
>> #endif
>>
>> - pr_info("Using paravirt steal-time\n");
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> Linux kernel is removing non-SMP step by step [1].
> https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_6.17#Unconditionally_compile_task_scheduler_with_SMP_support
>
> Though we cannot remove all "#ifdef CONFIG_SMP" at present, we can at
> least stop adding more.
>
> So I prefer to make this whole patch out of CONFIG_SMP. But if you
> don't like this, you can at least move the virt_preempt_key
> declaration out of "#ifdef CONFIG_SMP", then the #ifdefs here can be
> removed.
Sorry, I just notice this mail.
Will move virt_preempt_key out of CONFIG_SMP in next version.
Regards
Bibo Mao
>
> Huacai
>
>> + if (static_key_enabled(&virt_preempt_key))
>> + pr_info("Using paravirt steal-time with preempt enabled\n");
>> + else
>> +#endif
>> + pr_info("Using paravirt steal-time with preempt disabled\n");
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists