[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <o3rtwmpwb3jmzp3zyfizyiohylvt72j3ssmtvenesygl3vltri@subp7ujvzyfq>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 17:42:20 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz,
ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@...il.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yizhang089@...il.com,
libaokun1@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, yukuai@...as.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 5/7] ext4: remove unused unwritten parameter in
ext4_dio_write_iter()
On Sat 13-12-25 10:20:06, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
>
> The parameter unwritten in ext4_dio_write_iter() is no longer needed,
> simply remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/file.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index 6b4b68f830d5..fa22fc0e45f3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -424,14 +424,14 @@ static const struct iomap_dio_ops ext4_dio_write_ops = {
> */
> static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from,
> bool *ilock_shared, bool *extend,
> - bool *unwritten, int *dio_flags)
> + int *dio_flags)
> {
> struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> loff_t offset;
> size_t count;
> ssize_t ret;
> - bool overwrite, unaligned_io;
> + bool overwrite, unaligned_io, unwritten;
>
> restart:
> ret = ext4_generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from,
>
> unaligned_io = ext4_unaligned_io(inode, from, offset);
> *extend = ext4_extending_io(inode, offset, count);
> - overwrite = ext4_overwrite_io(inode, offset, count, unwritten);
> + overwrite = ext4_overwrite_io(inode, offset, count, &unwritten);
>
> /*
> * Determine whether we need to upgrade to an exclusive lock. This is
> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from,
> */
> if (*ilock_shared &&
> ((!IS_NOSEC(inode) || *extend || !overwrite ||
> - (unaligned_io && *unwritten)))) {
> + (unaligned_io && unwritten)))) {
> if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
> ret = -EAGAIN;
> goto out;
> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from,
> ret = -EAGAIN;
> goto out;
> }
> - if (unaligned_io && (!overwrite || *unwritten))
> + if (unaligned_io && (!overwrite || unwritten))
> inode_dio_wait(inode);
> *dio_flags = IOMAP_DIO_FORCE_WAIT;
> }
> @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
> loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
> size_t count = iov_iter_count(from);
> - bool extend = false, unwritten = false;
> + bool extend = false;
> bool ilock_shared = true;
> int dio_flags = 0;
>
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA);
>
> ret = ext4_dio_write_checks(iocb, from, &ilock_shared, &extend,
> - &unwritten, &dio_flags);
> + &dio_flags);
> if (ret <= 0)
> return ret;
>
> --
> 2.46.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists