[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76417a1c-1179-4e47-ab2d-00048116bfae@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 20:11:09 +0100
From: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, jose.exposito89@...il.com,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: victoria@...tem76.com, sebastian.wick@...hat.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 29/32] drm/vkms: Rename vkms_connector_init to
vkms_connector_init_static
On 12/19/25 19:58, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> On Wed Oct 29, 2025 at 3:37 PM CET, Louis Chauvet wrote:
>> With the introduction of dynamic connectors we will have two way of
>> initializing a VKMS connector. Rename the current function to clarify
>> the case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
>
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_connector.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_connector.h
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>> #define _VKMS_CONNECTOR_H_
>>
>> #include "vkms_drv.h"
>> +#include "vkms_config.h"
>
> Why? Maybe this is for another patch in the series?
This line is useful, I use struct vkms_config_connector
But I agree, this should be a separate patch.
> With that line removed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
>
>
> --
> Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists