[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+kEDGHL0A=KYhp79_08sx=dUyvpDOuHXEuvgsOU+61PshtN3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:49:32 +0100
From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
ath12k@...ts.infradead.org, Dale Whinham <daleyo@...il.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Surface Pro 11
Le ven. 19 déc. 2025 à 18:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> a écrit :
>
> On 18/12/2025 23:22, Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Dale Whinham <daleyo@...il.com>
> >
> > Add device trees for the Qualcomm X1E and X1P-based Microsoft Surface
> > Pro 11 machines (codenamed 'Denali').
> >
> > This device is very similar to the Surface Laptop 7 ('Romulus').
> >
> > Use a similar strategy to x1-asus-zenbook-a14.dtsi so that we can create
> > x1e and x1p-specific flavors of the device tree without too much code
> > duplication.
> >
> > Hardware support is similar to other X1 machines. The most notable
> > missing features are:
> >
> > - Touchscreen and pen
> > - Cameras (and status LEDs)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dale Whinham <daleyo@...il.com>
> > Tested-by: Dale Whinham <daleyo@...il.com>
>
> Drop, authorship implies this. Otherwise this suggest none of other
> authors test their code before sending.
Sure, I will remove this line in v5.
> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 4 +
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1-microsoft-denali.dtsi | 1324 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > .../dts/qcom/x1e80100-microsoft-denali-oled.dts | 20 +
> > .../boot/dts/qcom/x1p64100-microsoft-denali.dts | 16 +
> > 4 files changed, 1364 insertions(+)
> >
>
> This DTS fails dtbs_check.
Indeed, this has regressed when moving disable-rfkill into
ieee80211.yaml, we need to reference the moved property
from qcom,ath12k.yaml also now, I will fix this in v5.
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p64100-microsoft-denali.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p64100-microsoft-denali.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93f1620ad8c71c6cf36ba3ec34b9eebc47bf3f18
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p64100-microsoft-denali.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2024 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>
> How exactly is this copyrighted by Qualcomm? I don't think Qualcomm ever
> prepared DTS for this, so can you point us to the original work?
> > + * Copyright (c) 2025 Dale Whinham <daleyo@...il.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include "hamoa.dtsi"
> > +#include "x1-microsoft-denali.dtsi"
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + model = "Microsoft Surface Pro 11th Edition (LCD)";
> > + compatible = "microsoft,denali-lcd", "microsoft,denali",
> > + "qcom,x1p64100", "qcom,x1e80100";
> > +};
> >
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Thank you for the review,
Jérôme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists