lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUW7-sart2k302uO@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:56:26 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz, surenb@...gle.com,
	mhocko@...e.com, jackmanb@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
	osalvador@...e.de, rientjes@...gle.com, david@...hat.com,
	joshua.hahnjy@...il.com, fvdl@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] page_alloc: allow migration of smaller hugepages
 during contig_alloc

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 03:46:25PM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2025, at 9:26, Gregory Price wrote:
> 
> > Will think about this for a bit.
> 
> The sole caller of pfn_range_valid_contig(), alloc_contig_pages_noprof(),
> scans from the beginning of a zone to the end. pfn_range_valid_contig()
> should see head pages all the time, except it scans in the middle of
> a 1GB hugetlb when alloc_contig_pages_noprof() is asking for a smaller
> nr_pages, like 2MB. But in that case, the if above i += (1 << order) - 1
> would return false without reaching it. Basically, to get to
> i += ..., pfn_range_valid_contig() needs to search for nr_pages larger
> than PageHuge(page) and nr_pages is always power of two based on
> alloc_contig_pages_noprof() requirement, but that means
> pfn_range_valid_contig() always sees such PageHuge pages as a whole
> within nr_pages range, thus cannot see a tail PageHuge page at the
> point of i += ....
> 

right, and we hold the zone lock here, so we shouldn't see a page
suddenly become a tail page mid-iteration.

I hadn't mentally worked through whether it was a good idea to encode
this behavior now with only one user - but i suppose there's no point in
optimizing for code that doesn't exist, so i agree.  This does seem
fine.

Thanks!
Gregory

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ