linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kernel-hacking: Remove comma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ecoqkub6.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:58:37 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kernel-hacking: Remove comma

Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev> writes:

>> That's a fine change, but can I prevail upon you to get rid of the
>> usless :c:func: annotation while you're playing with that line?
>
> So just `schedule()`?

Yes.  We should never use :c:func:, our automarkup code will do the
right thing in its absence.

> :c:func: is used very often in the same file - maybe we should remove
> them all in a separate patch? I'm fine either way.

If you want to do them all, a separate patch probably makes sense.  That
would be wonderful.

Thanks,

jon