lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bBg9xpkNyeWVR5+YQhpZYxSvWzB=nXV_d4D+DmzLdSB1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 22:11:37 -0500
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com, rppt@...nel.org, 
	jasonmiu@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de, coxu@...hat.com, dave@...ilevsky.ca, 
	ebiggers@...gle.com, graf@...zon.com, kees@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	ricardo.neri@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] kho: Allow kexec load before KHO finalization

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 9:37 PM Ricardo Neri
<ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 07:26:19PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 4:49 PM Ricardo Neri
> > <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 02:00:00PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > > > Currently, kho_fill_kimage() checks kho_out.finalized and returns
> > > > early if KHO is not yet finalized. This enforces a strict ordering where
> > > > userspace must finalize KHO *before* loading the kexec image.
> > > >
> > > > This is restrictive, as standard workflows often involve loading the
> > > > target kernel early in the lifecycle and finalizing the state (FDT)
> > > > only immediately before the reboot.
> > > >
> > > > Since the KHO FDT resides at a physical address allocated during boot
> > > > (kho_init), its location is stable. We can attach this stable address
> > > > to the kimage regardless of whether the content has been finalized yet.
> > > >
> > > > Relax the check to only require kho_enable, allowing kexec_file_load
> > > > to proceed at any time.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> > > > index 461d96084c12..4596e67de832 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> > > > @@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ int kho_fill_kimage(struct kimage *image)
> > > >       int err = 0;
> > > >       struct kexec_buf scratch;
> > > >
> > > > -     if (!kho_out.finalized)
> > > > +     if (!kho_enable)
> > > >               return 0;
> > >
> > > Hi Pasha,
> > >
> > > Using v6.19-rc1 (which has this changeset) and with:
> > >
> > > CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER=y
> > > CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER_ENABLE_DEFAULT=y
> > > CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE=n (i.e., nobody calling kho_finalize())
> > > no reserve_mem= entries in the kernel command line
> > >
> > > I omit doing
> > >
> > > echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kho/out/finalize
> > >
> > > before doing
> > >
> > > kexec -l <kernel> --initrd=<initrd> --commandline="$(cat /proc/cmdline)"
> > > kexec -e
> >
> > Hi Ricardo,
> >
> > Thank you for reporting this bug. I created a fix here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251219002355.3323896-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com
> >
> > Please let me know if it works.
>
> Thanks for the quick reply, Pasha. Your patch does work for me (I saw you
> will post a v2).

I have sent v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251219030854.3527871-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com

>
> From this patchset, I gather that kho_finalize() can be called multiple
> times and in-kernel users of KHO should call it when done preparing their
> subrees. Is that correct?

This is correct, we now allow it to finalize multiple times. In kernel
users can choose to do that during reboot, we also removed abort.

Pasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ