linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] firmware: smccc: LFA: use smcc 1.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b8fdec67-584f-492e-b2a7-8c932871f459@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:47:52 -0800
From: Vedashree Vidwans <vvidwans@...dia.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, salman.nabi@....com
Cc: andre.przywara@....com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
 ardb@...nel.org, chao.gao@...el.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 sdonthineni@...dia.com, vsethi@...dia.com, vwadekar@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] firmware: smccc: LFA: use smcc 1.2



On 12/9/25 03:42, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 10:13:11PM +0000, Vedashree Vidwans wrote:
>> Update driver to use SMCCC 1.2+ version as mentioned in the LFA spec.
>>
> 
> I would prefer if you work with Salman Nabi and get this incorporated
> in the original patch by providing this as a review feedback.
> 
> There is no point in having this independent of the original patch as it
> is not yet merged.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Sudeep

Thank you for the suggestion.

Hi Salman,
Could we come up with a strategy to combine the LFA driver patches? I 
have been working on this recently and I would be happy to revise all 
the patches so that we are followiing the specification from the start.

Please let me know if you think of any other approach.

Regards,
Veda