[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUUd760l89lrNOs-@earth.li>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 09:42:07 +0000
From: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KEYS/KEYRINGS" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/12] tpm: Change tpm_get_random() opportunistic
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 11:21:38AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>hwrng framework does not have a requirement that the all bytes requested
>need to be provided. By enforcing such a requirement internally, TPM driver
>can cause unpredictability in latency, as a single tpm_get_random() call
>can result multiple TPM commands.
>
>Especially, when TCG_TPM2_HMAC is enabled, extra roundtrips could have
>significant effect to the system latency.
>
>Thus, send TPM command only once and return bytes received instead of
>committing to the number of requested bytes.
Function comment for tpm_get_random needs updated as well, as it
currently says "until all of the @max bytes have been received", which
is no longer true with this patch. With that:
Reviewed-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...a.com>
>Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
>Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
>---
>v7:
>- Given that hwrng is now only caller for tpm_get_random(), remove the
> wait parameter.
>v4:
>- Fixed grammar mistakes.
>---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 28 +++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>index d157be738612..677dcef05dfb 100644
>--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>@@ -626,10 +626,6 @@ static int tpm2_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *out, size_t max)
> */
> int tpm_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *out, size_t max)
> {
>- u32 num_bytes = max;
>- u8 *out_ptr = out;
>- int retries = 5;
>- int total = 0;
> int rc;
>
> if (!out || !max || max > TPM_MAX_RNG_DATA)
>@@ -646,28 +642,14 @@ int tpm_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *out, size_t max)
> rc = tpm2_start_auth_session(chip);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>- }
>-
>- do {
>- if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
>- rc = tpm2_get_random(chip, out_ptr, num_bytes);
>- else
>- rc = tpm1_get_random(chip, out_ptr, num_bytes);
>-
>- if (rc < 0)
>- goto err;
>-
>- out_ptr += rc;
>- total += rc;
>- num_bytes -= rc;
>- } while (retries-- && total < max);
>
>- tpm_put_ops(chip);
>- return total ? total : -EIO;
>+ rc = tpm2_get_random(chip, out, max);
>+ } else {
>+ rc = tpm1_get_random(chip, out, max);
>+ }
>
>-err:
> tpm_put_ops(chip);
>- return rc;
>+ return rc != 0 ? rc : -EIO;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_get_random);
>
>--
>2.39.5
>
>
J.
--
... We are talking one charming motherf**king pig.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists