[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0fa95ea2-4539-472b-adae-300e46a78f20@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 19:42:57 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, Koichiro Den <den@...inux.co.jp>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
mhi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] nvmet: pci-epf: Use
dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API
On 12/19/25 00:56, Frank Li wrote:
> Use the new dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API to combine the
> configuration and descriptor preparation into a single call.
>
> Since dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() performs the configuration and
> preparation atomically and dw edma driver implement prep_config_sg() call
> back, so dmaengine_prep_config_single() is reentriable, the mutex can be
> removed.
What about for platforms other than DesignWare EDMA ?
This is a generic endpoint driver that can work on any platform that is endpoint
capable and that has a DMA channel for the PCI endpoint.
The dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API should be handling everything
transparently for any platform, regardless of the DMA channel driver
implementing or not the prep_config_sg() callback.
For platforms that do not implement it, I suspect that the mutex will still be
needed here. So how to we resolve this ? Ideally, all of that should be hidden
by the DMA API. The endpoint driver should not need to deal with these differences.
>
> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c | 18 ++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> index 56b1c6a7706a9e2dd9d8aaf17b440129b948486c..8b5ea5d4c79dfd461b767cfd4033a9e4604c94b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> @@ -388,22 +388,15 @@ static int nvmet_pci_epf_dma_transfer(struct nvmet_pci_epf *nvme_epf,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(lock);
> -
> dma_dev = dmaengine_get_dma_device(chan);
> dma_addr = dma_map_single(dma_dev, seg->buf, seg->length, dir);
> ret = dma_mapping_error(dma_dev, dma_addr);
> if (ret)
> - goto unlock;
> -
> - ret = dmaengine_slave_config(chan, &sconf);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to configure DMA channel\n");
> - goto unmap;
> - }
> + return ret;
>
> - desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(chan, dma_addr, seg->length,
> - sconf.direction, DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> + desc = dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe(chan, dma_addr, seg->length,
> + sconf.direction,
> + DMA_CTRL_ACK, &sconf);
> if (!desc) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepare DMA\n");
> ret = -EIO;
> @@ -426,9 +419,6 @@ static int nvmet_pci_epf_dma_transfer(struct nvmet_pci_epf *nvme_epf,
> unmap:
> dma_unmap_single(dma_dev, dma_addr, seg->length, dir);
>
> -unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(lock);
> -
> return ret;
> }
>
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists