[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUVXI5wt9jm9x66E@codewreck.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:46:11 +0900
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Chris Arges <carges@...udflare.com>, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 9p read corruption of mmaped content (Was: [PATCH] 9p/virtio:
restrict page pinning to user_backed_iter() iovec)
David pointing this out on IRC (thanks!)
> you may have actually caught the bug in your trace
> kworker/u16:2-233 [002] ..... 3031.183459: netfs_folio: i=157f3 ix=00005-00005 read-unlock
> ...
> clang-318 [002] ..... 3031.183462: netfs_sreq: R=00001b55[2] ZERO SUBMT f=000
> s=5fb2 0/4e s=0 e=0
> we shouldn't have unlocked page 5 yet
> we still have to clear the tail of the page
And indeed, if I update the read_collect code to not unlock as soon as
we've read i_size but wait for the tail to be cleared as follow, I can't
reproduce anymore:
---------
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
index a95e7aadafd0..7a0ffa675fb1 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void netfs_read_unlock_folios(struct netfs_io_request *rreq,
rreq->front_folio_order = order;
fsize = PAGE_SIZE << order;
fpos = folio_pos(folio);
- fend = umin(fpos + fsize, rreq->i_size);
+ fend = fpos + fsize;
trace_netfs_collect_folio(rreq, folio, fend, collected_to);
---------
It's too late for me to think of the implications and consider this
diff's correctness, but with that patch the kernel is happily building
with LLVM=1, so I'm fairly confident this particular bug goes away...
(Now that umin() dates back v6.14-rc1 (commit e2d46f2ec332 ("netfs:
Change the read result collector to only use one work item")), I guess
I'll want to check if it's been broken this long next, or if it's a side
effect of another change... Tomorrow...)
I'm off to bed, feel free to send a patch with the above if you think
it's correct
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists