[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cy4aeg56.fsf@igel.home>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:48:53 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@...ux.dev>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>,
rostedt@...dmis.org, daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiang.biao@...ux.dev,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/6] bpf: fix the usage of
BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME
On Dez 19 2025, Menglong Dong wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 5f9457e910e8..09b70bf362d3 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
> store_args(nr_arg_slots, args_off, ctx);
>
> /* skip to actual body of traced function */
> - if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK)
> + if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG)
> orig_call += RV_FENTRY_NINSNS * 4;
There are now three occurrences of that condition, and only the third
one uses orig_call. How about merging them?
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists