[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30f6f550-45c3-41dc-8af0-4a80fabd49b6@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 09:23:07 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dale Whinham <daleyo@...il.com>, jerome.debretagne@...il.com,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, ath12k@...ts.infradead.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Surface Pro 11
On 19/12/2025 20:27, Dale Whinham wrote:
> On 19/12/2025 17:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>>
>> How exactly is this copyrighted by Qualcomm? I don't think Qualcomm ever
>> prepared DTS for this, so can you point us to the original work?
>
> As mentioned in the commit message, this device is very similar to
> Microsoft Romulus (Surface Laptop 7).
>
> Its associated device tree (x1e80100-microsoft-romulus.dtsi) was used as
DTS, not DTSI, although about that I would also have same question.
> a starting point for SP11, and so I felt it would be courteous to keep
> the original copyright notice there.
>
> If this isn't appropriate, then that's fair enough and we can remove it.
There are just few lines in this DTS, but if you still copied them from
other one, then it is fine.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists