lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251220-imaginary-merciful-quoll-a91a4c@quoll>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 09:54:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>, andersson@...nel.org, 
	mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: add IPQ9574 image
 loader

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 08:44:33AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:34:10PM -0600, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> > Document the IPQ9574 native (non-PAS) WCSS image loader. It is similar
> > to IPQ8074 WCSS, but requires several new clocks. These clocks must be
> > enabled by the host in non-PAS mode, and are not optional. Add an
> > example that uses the "qcom,ipq9574-wcss-pil" binding.
> 
> Is the new example really much different and unique. If not, drop it 
> (especially since it wasn't even tested).

There is simply no example for existing devices, so this is fine. It
could be mentioned here WHY it is being added, which would solve two
people's questions (yours and mine earlier). If only people knew and
said WHY they are doing something.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ