[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251220-imaginary-merciful-quoll-a91a4c@quoll>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 09:54:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: add IPQ9574 image
loader
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 08:44:33AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:34:10PM -0600, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> > Document the IPQ9574 native (non-PAS) WCSS image loader. It is similar
> > to IPQ8074 WCSS, but requires several new clocks. These clocks must be
> > enabled by the host in non-PAS mode, and are not optional. Add an
> > example that uses the "qcom,ipq9574-wcss-pil" binding.
>
> Is the new example really much different and unique. If not, drop it
> (especially since it wasn't even tested).
There is simply no example for existing devices, so this is fine. It
could be mentioned here WHY it is being added, which would solve two
people's questions (yours and mine earlier). If only people knew and
said WHY they are doing something.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists