linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/14] iio: pressure: mprls0025pa: make ops->write function consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aUZzdbBUJtf4mAjQ@sunspire.home.arpa>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 11:59:17 +0200
From: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
	Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] iio: pressure: mprls0025pa: make ops->write
 function consistent


Hello,

On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 01:49:30AM -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> On 12/18, Petre Rodan wrote:
> > Make the i2c bus write operation more consistent with the rest of the
> > driver.
> That's not the most appealing reason for updating driver code. Is the update
> meaningful for a different purpose? Consider squashing that with another patch
> that makes better use of the updated function. 

I see your point.

I wanted to have device specific logic in _core instead of one of the bus drivers,
but if I'm the only one upset about it then I will skip this change.

best regards,
peter

-- 
petre rodan

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)