[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251220100923.2a3de6db@pumpkin>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 10:09:23 +0000
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Preyas <preyas17@...omail.in>
Cc: marvin24@....de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ac100@...ts.launchpad.net,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: nvec: replace short udelay with usleep_range
On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 09:22:29 +0000
Preyas <preyas17@...omail.in> wrote:
> From: Preyas Sharma <preyas17@...omail.in>
>
> Signed-off-by: Preyas Sharma <preyas17@...omail.in>
> ---
> drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> index 263774e6a78c..6ffe5e8656d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
> break;
> case 2: /* first byte after command */
> if (status == (I2C_SL_IRQ | RNW | RCVD)) {
> - udelay(33);
> + usleep_range(33, 66);
Given its name the function looks like an ISR - where you can't sleep.
Spinning isn't a good idea either....
David
> if (nvec->rx->data[0] != 0x01) {
> dev_err(nvec->dev,
> "Read without prior read command\n");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists