[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251220110241.8435-2-ionut.nechita@windriver.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 13:02:40 +0200
From: "Ionut Nechita (WindRiver)" <djiony2011@...il.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk,
ming.lei@...hat.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev,
sashal@...nel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Ionut Nechita <ionut.nechita@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] block/blk-mq: fix RT kernel regression with queue_lock in hot path
From: Ionut Nechita <ionut.nechita@...driver.com>
Commit 679b1874eba7 ("block: fix ordering between checking
QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED request adding") introduced queue_lock acquisition
in blk_mq_run_hw_queue() to synchronize QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED checks.
On RT kernels (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT), regular spinlocks are converted to
rt_mutex (sleeping locks). When multiple MSI-X IRQ threads process I/O
completions concurrently, they contend on queue_lock in the hot path,
causing all IRQ threads to enter D (uninterruptible sleep) state. This
serializes interrupt processing completely.
Test case (MegaRAID 12GSAS with 8 MSI-X vectors on RT kernel):
- Good (v6.6.52-rt): 640 MB/s sequential read
- Bad (v6.6.64-rt): 153 MB/s sequential read (-76% regression)
- 6-8 out of 8 MSI-X IRQ threads stuck in D-state waiting on queue_lock
The original commit message mentioned memory barriers as an alternative
approach. Use full memory barriers (smp_mb) instead of queue_lock to
provide the same ordering guarantees without sleeping in RT kernel.
Memory barriers ensure proper synchronization:
- CPU0 either sees QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED cleared, OR
- CPU1 sees dispatch list/sw queue bitmap updates
This maintains correctness while avoiding lock contention that causes
RT kernel IRQ threads to sleep in the I/O completion path.
Fixes: 679b1874eba7 ("block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED request adding")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nechita <ionut.nechita@...driver.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 5da948b07058..5fb8da4958d0 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2292,22 +2292,19 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
might_sleep_if(!async && hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING);
+ /*
+ * First lockless check to avoid unnecessary overhead.
+ * Memory barrier below synchronizes with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue().
+ */
need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx);
if (!need_run) {
- unsigned long flags;
-
- /*
- * Synchronize with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(), because we check
- * if hw queue is quiesced locklessly above, we need the use
- * ->queue_lock to make sure we see the up-to-date status to
- * not miss rerunning the hw queue.
- */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags);
+ /* Synchronize with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() */
+ smp_mb();
need_run = blk_mq_hw_queue_need_run(hctx);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hctx->queue->queue_lock, flags);
-
if (!need_run)
return;
+ /* Ensure dispatch list/sw queue updates visible before execution */
+ smp_mb();
}
if (async || !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask)) {
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists