[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNMAGYeFK-jYafSihmA+T7wi3zC8Sb4fJ+ZjzDK5jGuMvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 13:52:13 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Chris Li <sparse@...isli.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/36] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's context analysis
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 at 21:55, 'Bart Van Assche' via kasan-dev
<kasan-dev@...glegroups.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/19/25 7:40 AM, Marco Elver wrote:
> > static inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > + __assumes_ctx_lock(sem)
> > {
> > WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE);
> > }
> >
> > static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > + __assumes_ctx_lock(sem)
> > {
> > WARN_ON(!(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED));
> > }
> > @@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ do { \
> > static struct lock_class_key __key; \
> > \
> > __init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
> > + __assume_ctx_lock(sem); \
> > } while (0)
>
> Just like as for lockdep.h, I think that the above annotations should be
> changed into __must_hold().
My point is the same: we use it to delegate to dynamic analysis where
we reach the limits of static analysis, to avoid false positives [1].
Code should apply __must_hold() or __guarded_by() to called or
protected variables respectively, which is both cleaner and the
idiomatic way to use all this.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANpmjNPp6Gkz3rdaD0V7EkPrm60sA5tPpw+m8Xg3u8MTXuc2mg@mail.gmail.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists