| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2gqFPsCOktAGfU_F2_LxGu3hv0T5OJHy10mV9E_AA_AjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 09:32:27 -0500
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: ellyndra <ellyesparza8@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/syscall: make sys_call helpers static
On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 9:10 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 08:50:31AM -0500, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:01 AM ellyndra <ellyesparza8@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Make 'x64_sys_call()' 'x32_sys_call()' and 'ia32_sys_call()' static to
> > > prevent them from being resolved via kallsyms and by extension kprobes.
> > >
> > > These functions contain the final calls to the syscall handlers, having
> > > access to their address can be used to hook this calls altering their
> > > behavior. Preventing symbol visibility limits the area of such attacks.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Elly I Esparza <ellyesparza8@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c | 6 ++++--
> > > arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h | 8 --------
> > > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
> > > index 2b15ea17bb7c..28c9a99fb2de 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
> > > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ const sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[] = {
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > #define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) case nr: return __ia32_##sym(regs);
> > > -long ia32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
> > > +static __always_inline long ia32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
> > > {
> > > switch (nr) {
> > > #include <asm/syscalls_32.h>
> > > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ early_param("ia32_emulation", ia32_emulation_override_cmdline);
> > > /*
> > > * Invoke a 32-bit syscall. Called with IRQs on in CT_STATE_KERNEL.
> > > */
> > > -static __always_inline void do_syscall_32_irqs_on(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
> > > +static noinstr void do_syscall_32_irqs_on(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
> > > {
> > > /*
> > > * Convert negative numbers to very high and thus out of range
> > > @@ -78,12 +78,14 @@ static __always_inline void do_syscall_32_irqs_on(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
> > > */
> > > unsigned int unr = nr;
> > >
> > > + instrumentation_begin();
> > > if (likely(unr < IA32_NR_syscalls)) {
> > > unr = array_index_nospec(unr, IA32_NR_syscalls);
> > > regs->ax = ia32_sys_call(regs, unr);
> > > } else if (nr != -1) {
> > > regs->ax = __ia32_sys_ni_syscall(regs);
> > > }
> > > + instrumentation_end();
> > > }
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c
> > > index b6e68ea98b83..55ad274f57f5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c
> > > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ const sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[] = {
> > > #undef __SYSCALL
> > >
> > > #define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) case nr: return __x64_##sym(regs);
> > > -long x64_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
> > > +static __always_inline long x64_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
> > > {
> > > switch (nr) {
> > > #include <asm/syscalls_64.h>
> > > @@ -40,15 +40,17 @@ long x64_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
> > > -long x32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
> > > +static __always_inline long x32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
> > > {
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
> > > switch (nr) {
> > > #include <asm/syscalls_x32.h>
> > > default: return __x64_sys_ni_syscall(regs);
> > > }
> > > -}
> > > +#else
> > > + return __x64_sys_ni_syscall(regs);
> > > #endif
> > > +}
> > >
> > > static __always_inline bool do_syscall_x64(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
> > > {
> > > @@ -58,11 +60,13 @@ static __always_inline bool do_syscall_x64(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
> > > */
> > > unsigned int unr = nr;
> > >
> > > + instrumentation_begin();
> > > if (likely(unr < NR_syscalls)) {
> > > unr = array_index_nospec(unr, NR_syscalls);
> > > regs->ax = x64_sys_call(regs, unr);
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > > + instrumentation_end();
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h
> > > index c10dbb74cd00..59a406074dc0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h
> > > @@ -20,14 +20,6 @@
> > > typedef long (*sys_call_ptr_t)(const struct pt_regs *);
> > > extern const sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[];
> > >
> > > -/*
> > > - * These may not exist, but still put the prototypes in so we
> > > - * can use IS_ENABLED().
> > > - */
> > > -extern long ia32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *, unsigned int nr);
> > > -extern long x32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *, unsigned int nr);
> > > -extern long x64_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *, unsigned int nr);
> > > -
> > > /*
> > > * Only the low 32 bits of orig_ax are meaningful, so we return int.
> > > * This importantly ignores the high bits on 64-bit, so comparisons
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> > >
> >
> > The main benefit of having the switch in a discrete function is that
> > it allows the compiler to do tail-call optimizations, reducing text
> > size. Isn't it possible to blacklist functions from kprobes?
>
> Ofcourse. But I'm not sure I understand your concern. Both
> x{64,32}_sys_call() only have a single caller, inlining them avoids the
> whole call, tail or otherwise, how is that a bad thing?
>
text data bss dec hex filename
13194 128 0 13322 340a
arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.o
10239 136 0 10375 2887
arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.o.orig
That's a 3k increase in text size when it's inlined.
Brian Gerst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists