linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net v2] net: mscc: ocelot: Fix crash when adding interface under a lag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4958770f-3e36-4d90-80ea-4bfca69bb61a@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 20:58:08 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Jerry Wu <w.7erry@...mail.com>, vladimir.oltean@....com
Cc: claudiu.manoil@....com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
 UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: mscc: ocelot: Fix crash when adding interface
 under a lag

Le 20/12/2025 à 19:56, Jerry Wu a écrit :
> Commit 15faa1f67ab4 ("lan966x: Fix crash when adding interface under a lag")
> fixed a similar issue in the lan966x driver caused by a NULL pointer dereference.
> The ocelot_set_aggr_pgids() function in the ocelot driver has similar logic
> and is susceptible to the same crash.
> 
> This issue specifically affects the ocelot_vsc7514.c frontend, which leaves
> unused ports as NULL pointers. The felix_vsc9959.c frontend is unaffected as
> it uses the DSA framework which registers all ports.
> 
> Fix this by checking if the port pointer is valid before accessing it.
> 
> Fixes: 528d3f190c98 ("net: mscc: ocelot: drop the use of the "lags" array")
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Wu <w.7erry@...mail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c | 6 ++++--
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> index 08bee56aea35..6f917fd7af4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> @@ -2307,14 +2307,16 @@ static void ocelot_set_aggr_pgids(struct ocelot *ocelot)
>   
>   	/* Now, set PGIDs for each active LAG */
>   	for (lag = 0; lag < ocelot->num_phys_ports; lag++) {
> -		struct net_device *bond = ocelot->ports[lag]->bond;
> +		struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = ocelot->ports[lag];

Hi,

Does it compile?

Should this be struct ocelot_port *port = ocelot->ports[lag]; ?

CJ

>   		int num_active_ports = 0;
> +		struct net_device *bond;
>   		unsigned long bond_mask;
>   		u8 aggr_idx[16];
>   
> -		if (!bond || (visited & BIT(lag)))
> +		if (!port || !port->bond || (visited & BIT(lag)))
>   			continue;
>   
> +		bond = port->bond;
>   		bond_mask = ocelot_get_bond_mask(ocelot, bond);
>   
>   		for_each_set_bit(port, &bond_mask, ocelot->num_phys_ports) {