lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251220025926-GYA1962618@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 10:59:26 +0800
From: Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>
To: Yao Zi <me@...ao.cc>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>, Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>,
	Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	spacemit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: spacemit: fix auxiliary device id

Hi Yao,

On 02:40 Sat 20 Dec     , Yao Zi wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 09:11:20AM +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
> > Due to the auxiliary register procedure moved to ccu common module,
> > the auxiliary device id need to be adjusted, otherwise reset driver
> > will fail to probe.
> 
> Does it mean the reset driver fails to probe with only PATCH 1 in the
> series applied? If so these two patches should probably be merged, or we
> will get unfunctional commits.
yes, it will fail with only patch 1

and no, I do not want to combine them together as they belong to
different subsystem. it shouldn't be a problem if they are accepted in
same merge window, or if people too picky to worry bisectable breakage,
then I would ask reset/clock maintainer an ack instead to make it go
via clock tree in one combined PR

-- 
Yixun Lan (dlan)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ