[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251220025926-GYA1962618@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 10:59:26 +0800
From: Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>
To: Yao Zi <me@...ao.cc>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>, Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
spacemit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: spacemit: fix auxiliary device id
Hi Yao,
On 02:40 Sat 20 Dec , Yao Zi wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 09:11:20AM +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
> > Due to the auxiliary register procedure moved to ccu common module,
> > the auxiliary device id need to be adjusted, otherwise reset driver
> > will fail to probe.
>
> Does it mean the reset driver fails to probe with only PATCH 1 in the
> series applied? If so these two patches should probably be merged, or we
> will get unfunctional commits.
yes, it will fail with only patch 1
and no, I do not want to combine them together as they belong to
different subsystem. it shouldn't be a problem if they are accepted in
same merge window, or if people too picky to worry bisectable breakage,
then I would ask reset/clock maintainer an ack instead to make it go
via clock tree in one combined PR
--
Yixun Lan (dlan)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists