[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUYfxQtmWO3STLa8@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 12:02:13 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Youngjun Park <youngjun.park@....com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/19] mm, swap: cleanup swap entry management workflow
On 12/20/25 at 03:43am, Kairui Song wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
>
> The current swap entry allocation/freeing workflow has never had a clear
> definition. This makes it hard to debug or add new optimizations.
>
> This commit introduces a proper definition of how swap entries would be
> allocated and freed. Now, most operations are folio based, so they will
> never exceed one swap cluster, and we now have a cleaner border between
> swap and the rest of mm, making it much easier to follow and debug,
> especially with new added sanity checks. Also making more optimization
> possible.
>
> Swap entry will be mostly allocated and free with a folio bound.
~~~~
freed, typo
> The folio lock will be useful for resolving many swap ralated races.
>
> Now swap allocation (except hibernation) always starts with a folio in
> the swap cache, and gets duped/freed protected by the folio lock:
>
> - folio_alloc_swap() - The only allocation entry point now.
> Context: The folio must be locked.
> This allocates one or a set of continuous swap slots for a folio and
> binds them to the folio by adding the folio to the swap cache. The
> swap slots' swap count start with zero value.
>
> - folio_dup_swap() - Increase the swap count of one or more entries.
> Context: The folio must be locked and in the swap cache. For now, the
> caller still has to lock the new swap entry owner (e.g., PTL).
> This increases the ref count of swap entries allocated to a folio.
> Newly allocated swap slots' count has to be increased by this helper
> as the folio got unmapped (and swap entries got installed).
>
> - folio_put_swap() - Decrease the swap count of one or more entries.
> Context: The folio must be locked and in the swap cache. For now, the
> caller still has to lock the new swap entry owner (e.g., PTL).
> This decreases the ref count of swap entries allocated to a folio.
> Typically, swapin will decrease the swap count as the folio got
> installed back and the swap entry got uninstalled
>
> This won't remove the folio from the swap cache and free the
> slot. Lazy freeing of swap cache is helpful for reducing IO.
> There is already a folio_free_swap() for immediate cache reclaim.
> This part could be further optimized later.
>
> The above locking constraints could be further relaxed when the swap
> table if fully implemented. Currently dup still needs the caller
~~ s/if/is/ typo
> to lock the swap entry container (e.g. PTL), or a concurrent zap
> may underflow the swap count.
......
Powered by blists - more mailing lists