linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 4/5] selftests/mm: va_high_addr_switch return fail when either test failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251221040025.3159990-4-chuhu@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 12:00:24 +0800
From: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	david@...nel.org,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
	vbabka@...e.cz,
	rppt@...nel.org,
	surenb@...gle.com,
	mhocko@...e.com,
	chuhu@...hat.com,
	Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] selftests/mm: va_high_addr_switch return fail when either test failed

When the first test failed, and the hugetlb test passed, the result would
be pass, but we expect a fail. Fix this issue by returning fail if either
is not KSFT_PASS.

CC: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c
index 02f290a69132..51401e081b20 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int supported_arch(void)
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret, hugetlb_ret = KSFT_PASS;
 
 	if (!supported_arch())
 		return KSFT_SKIP;
@@ -331,6 +331,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	ret = run_test(testcases, sz_testcases);
 	if (argc == 2 && !strcmp(argv[1], "--run-hugetlb"))
-		ret = run_test(hugetlb_testcases, sz_hugetlb_testcases);
-	return ret;
+		hugetlb_ret = run_test(hugetlb_testcases, sz_hugetlb_testcases);
+
+	if (ret == KSFT_PASS && hugetlb_ret == KSFT_PASS)
+		return KSFT_PASS;
+	else
+		return KSFT_FAIL;
 }
-- 
2.49.0