[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176643400575.1902051.11698155532364546867.b4-ty@google.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:24:16 +0000
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] module: replace use of system_wq with system_dfl_wq
On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:50:49 +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
> used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
> schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
> again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
>
> This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
>
> [...]
Applied to modules-next, thanks!
[1/1] module: replace use of system_wq with system_dfl_wq
commit: 581ac2d4a58b81669cc6abf645a558bce5cf14ab
Best regards,
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists