[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5629607-274e-4dc8-b759-7a04dba390c9@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 12:30:39 -0800
From: jane.chu@...cle.com
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, osalvador@...e.de, david@...nel.org,
linmiaohe@...wei.com, jiaqiyan@...gle.com, william.roche@...cle.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory-failure: teach kill_accessing_process to
accept hugetlb tail page pfn
On 12/19/2025 10:18 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 10:55:16AM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
>> static int check_hwpoisoned_entry(pte_t pte, unsigned long addr, short shift,
>> - unsigned long poisoned_pfn, struct to_kill *tk)
>> + unsigned long poisoned_pfn, struct to_kill *tk,
>> + int pte_nr)
>
> if we pass in huge_page_mask() instead ...
>
>> {
>> unsigned long pfn = 0;
>> + unsigned long hwpoison_vaddr;
>>
>> if (pte_present(pte)) {
>> pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
>> @@ -694,10 +696,11 @@ static int check_hwpoisoned_entry(pte_t pte, unsigned long addr, short shift,
>> pfn = swp_offset_pfn(swp);
>> }
>>
>> - if (!pfn || pfn != poisoned_pfn)
>> + if (!pfn || (pfn > poisoned_pfn || (pfn + pte_nr - 1) < poisoned_pfn))
>
> ... then we can simplify this to:
>
> if (!pfn || ((pfn | mask) != (poisoned_pfn | mask))
>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -2037,6 +2038,7 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
>> return action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON, MF_IGNORED);
>> }
>>
>> +
>> folio = page_folio(p);
>> folio_lock(folio);
>
> unnecessary whitespace change
Thanks! I'll incorporate the mask idea in v3.
-jane
Powered by blists - more mailing lists