linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 12/23] net: wan: framer: Discard pm_runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2279041.Mh6RI2rZIc@rafael.j.wysocki>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 21:16:29 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
 Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
 [PATCH v1 12/23] net: wan: framer: Discard pm_runtime_put() return values

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

The framer driver defines framer_pm_runtime_put() to return an int,
but that return value is never used.  It also passes the return value
of pm_runtime_put() to the caller which is not very useful.

Returning an error code from pm_runtime_put() merely means that it has
not queued up a work item to check whether or not the device can be
suspended and there are many perfectly valid situations in which that
can happen, like after writing "on" to the devices' runtime PM "control"
attribute in sysfs for one example.

Modify phy_pm_runtime_put() to discard the pm_runtime_put() return
value and change its return type to void.

No intentional functional impact.

This will facilitate a planned change of the pm_runtime_put() return
type to void in the future.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---

This patch is part of a series, but it doesn't depend on anything else
in that series.  The last patch in the series depends on it.

It can be applied by itself and if you decide to do so, please let me
know.

Otherwise, an ACK or equivalent will be appreciated, but also the lack
of specific criticism will be eventually regarded as consent.

---
 drivers/net/wan/framer/framer-core.c |    7 ++-----
 include/linux/framer/framer.h        |    5 ++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wan/framer/framer-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/framer/framer-core.c
@@ -60,12 +60,9 @@ int framer_pm_runtime_get_sync(struct fr
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(framer_pm_runtime_get_sync);

-int framer_pm_runtime_put(struct framer *framer)
+void framer_pm_runtime_put(struct framer *framer)
 {
-	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&framer->dev))
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
-	return pm_runtime_put(&framer->dev);
+	pm_runtime_put(&framer->dev);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(framer_pm_runtime_put);

--- a/include/linux/framer/framer.h
+++ b/include/linux/framer/framer.h
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ struct framer {
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GENERIC_FRAMER)
 int framer_pm_runtime_get(struct framer *framer);
 int framer_pm_runtime_get_sync(struct framer *framer);
-int framer_pm_runtime_put(struct framer *framer);
+void framer_pm_runtime_put(struct framer *framer);
 int framer_pm_runtime_put_sync(struct framer *framer);
 int framer_init(struct framer *framer);
 int framer_exit(struct framer *framer);
@@ -124,9 +124,8 @@ static inline int framer_pm_runtime_get_
 	return -ENOSYS;
 }

-static inline int framer_pm_runtime_put(struct framer *framer)
+static inline void framer_pm_runtime_put(struct framer *framer)
 {
-	return -ENOSYS;
 }

 static inline int framer_pm_runtime_put_sync(struct framer *framer)