[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025122232-grass-stoppage-6645@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:22:14 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@...look.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: digicolor: fix use-after-free on driver unbind
On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 12:55:02PM +0800, Junrui Luo wrote:
> The digicolor_uart_console_write() function accesses the global
> digicolor_ports[] array to retrieve the uart port pointer, which
> can lead to a use-after-free if the console write occurs after
> the port has been removed via unbind.
>
> digicolor_uart_remove() leaves a dangling pointer in the array.
>
> Fix by clearing the array entry in digicolor_uart_remove() and
> adding a NULL check in digicolor_uart_console_write().
>
> Reported-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@...look.com>
> Fixes: 5930cb3511df ("serial: driver for Conexant Digicolor USART")
> Signed-off-by: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@...look.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c
> index d2482df5cb9b..5861be2072c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c
> @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ static void digicolor_uart_console_write(struct console *co, const char *c,
> unsigned long flags;
> int locked = 1;
>
> + if (!port)
> + return;
> +
What prevents port from changing right after you tested this?
And who is calling unbind on a port? Why? That's a debuggging thing
that a developer could do, it should not be part of any normal system
operation.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists