[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251222105726.16440Adf-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 11:57:26 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/cmm: Use max to simplify cmm_timer_fn
Thorsten,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 11:39:17AM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Use max() to replace the open-coded version and simplify cmm_timer_fn().
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
> ---
> arch/s390/mm/cmm.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
...
> nr = cmm_timed_pages_target - cmm_timeout_pages;
> - if (nr < 0)
> - cmm_timed_pages_target = 0;
> - else
> - cmm_timed_pages_target = nr;
> + cmm_timed_pages_target = max(0, nr);
Just in case it wasn't clear in the past: trivial patches like this won't be
taken. You already managed to send buggy patches which look trivial, and I'm
not willing to spend time to look for subtle bugs such trivial patches might
introduce.
In other words: you may stop sending such patches which address s390 code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists