linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx412: Extend the power-on waiting time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPY8ntDAiJcJiixo2mTqcb898UC3AR-+NVPFPS6EtrGoEWKewg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 14:16:44 +0000
From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
To: Wenmeng Liu <wenmeng.liu@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wenmeng Liu <quic_wenmliu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx412: Extend the power-on waiting time

Hi Wenmeng

On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 at 12:20, Wenmeng Liu <wenmeng.liu@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/22/2025 8:11 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > Hi Wenmeng & Sakari
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 at 09:35, Wenmeng Liu <wenmeng.liu@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> The Arducam IMX577 module requires a longer reset time than the 1000µs
> >>>> configured in the current driver. Increase the wait time after power-on
> >>>> to ensure proper initialization.
> >>>
> >>> Is this somehow specific to the Arducam module? If so, what's there in the
> >>> module that requires this?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes, This issue occurred on the Arducam 22-pin IMX577 module.
> >> I have tried changing the sequence of regulator, reset, and clock, and
> >> found that this module must wait a sufficient amount of time after reset
> >> before registers can be written (10 ms is a safe duration). This issue
> >> did not occur when using other IMX577 modules.
> >
> > Is it the probe that fails, or starting streaming?
> >
> > Google has found me a datasheet for IMX577 at [1]. I'm hoping you have
> > an official datasheet, so do correct the following if that has any
> > updates.
> > Section 7-2-2 on page 30 for the startup sequence.
> >
> > The sequence is meant to be regulators, INCK, and then XCLR. The
> > driver does XCLR before clock, so that would appear to be wrong.
> >
> > It also states that T6 as the time from XCLR to being able to read the
> > version register is min 0.6ms, but T7 as the time before you can send
> > "Streaming Commmand" is min 8ms "To complete reading all parameters
> > from NVM".
> > That would be a difference between probe and start_streaming, although
> > admittedly sending the mode and control setup I2C commands will take
> > up some of that time.
> >
> > Plausibly the other set of modules don't have the NVM programmed and
> > hence they are ready sooner. Either way I'd say that does mean the
> > driver currently isn't following the defined power up sequence, and
> > the patch looks reasonable for IMX577.
> > However as this is a shared driver does IMX412 have this restriction
> > too? I can't find a datasheet for that one to check. For the sake of
> > ~9ms it's not going to make a huge difference though.
> >
> >    Dave
> >
> > [1] https://en.sunnywale.com/uploadfile/2021/1222/IMX577-AACK-C(Awin).pdf
> >
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> this issue appears in the write register when streamon
> imx412_write_regs.  poweron->streamon.
>
> static int imx412_start_streaming(struct imx412 *imx412)
> {
>          const struct imx412_reg_list *reg_list;
>          int ret;
>
>          /* Write sensor mode registers */
>          reg_list = &imx412->cur_mode->reg_list;
>          ret = imx412_write_regs(imx412, reg_list->regs,
>                                  reg_list->num_of_regs);
>          if (ret) {
>                  dev_err(imx412->dev, "fail to write initial registers\n");
>                  return ret;
>          }
>
>          /* Setup handler will write actual exposure and gain */
>          ret =  __v4l2_ctrl_handler_setup(imx412->sd.ctrl_handler);
>          if (ret) {
>                  dev_err(imx412->dev, "fail to setup handler\n");
>                  return ret;
>          }
>
>          /* Delay is required before streaming*/
>          usleep_range(7400, 8000);
>
>          /* Start streaming */
>          ret = imx412_write_reg(imx412, IMX412_REG_MODE_SELECT,
>                                 1, IMX412_MODE_STREAMING);
>          if (ret) {
>                  dev_err(imx412->dev, "fail to start streaming\n");
>                  return ret;
>          }
>
>          return 0;
> }
>  > but T7 as the time before you can send "Streaming Commmand" is min 8ms "
> I think the usleep_range(7400, 8000) represents the 8ms duration
> required by T7.

I'd missed that one.
If you've delayed for 10-12ms between coming out of reset and sending
the first command, then does the Arducam module still require another
8ms here, or can that be removed as you've already complied with T7?

Have you asked Arducam as to why their module takes longer? I can't
find an IMX577 module listed on their product pages so presumably it's
discontinued. There are a few links for a Luxonis Oak DepthAI board
[1] which is made by Arducam and is using IMX577, so is it that one?
Generally I've not encountered an issue with Arducam adding any weird
delay circuits on their sensor boards.

  Dave

[1] https://shop.luxonis.com/products/oak-ffc-imx577-m12

> Thanks,
> Wenmeng
>
>