[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <176651186992.759340.3813003594906863484.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:14:29 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, shawnguo@...nel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, jun.li@....com, Frank.Li@....com,
Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>
Cc: linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: change ssc_range value for
i.MX8MQ
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 16:13:54 +0800, Xu Yang wrote:
> According to IC engineer suggestion, set ssc_range as -4003 ppm
> will have more tolerance for EMI, and suitable for more boards.
> Besides, it's confirmed that with this setting the TX SSC test
> will pass on one customer board.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: change ssc_range value for i.MX8MQ
commit: c9d03933ea161a5543e15857ee519c60ec04fe9b
Best regards,
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists